Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Darren on August 29, 2011 at 12:24pm

My internet buddy Richard Merrick of                                                www.interferencetheory.com

replied with this comment about Cotterell's proposed theory:

 

Darren,

Don't think gravity works the way Cotterell describes. He dismisses the quantized structure of space as the source of gravity (along with relativity and quantum mechanics), which has been observed in gravity lensing and has even been measured of late. He proposes instead that particles have an attraction mechanism without explaining where that attraction originates.

Particles are simply nodes of wave interference resonating in the medium of space. It is the displacement and warping of the space lattice that is at the root of all four forces and not particles themselves. I can find no evidence that gravitons exist or that some magical force produced by particles or waves are the root cause of attraction or repulsion. It's like Cotterell says - it makes no sense that positive and negative particles act the way they do. That's because their behavior is not a function of charge.

Magnetism, gravity, strong and weak forces are different scales of polarization in the space lattice, which is probably a Schwartzschild cubic lattice or field of quantum sized black holes.  Within this "perforated" medium, particles (or nodes in wave interference) falls in line with the spin orientation of these nominal black holes which occurs as matter displaces space and begins to spin according to the Coriolis effect of whatever larger polarized field contain them. Einstein and Planck were essentially correct about space and its cubic structure and continue to be proven so.

Not trying to be argumentative or dismissive here - just offering another view for your consideration.

- Richard

 

 

 

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Darren on August 30, 2011 at 1:16pm

Hi Neil!

It is a difficult endeavor to develop a big TOE ( Theory Of Everything ) Unified Field Theory connecting Electricity, Magnetism and Gravity. Might as well throw the "Big Bang" in there too! For all the bangers! The big bang is theoretically what is behind all motion - but that's linear thinking and motion is spiral not linear. Chrystallography is the weeder course for geologists ( as well as P-Math, Practical Math ). Equating the body/spirit/soul with lower reptiles upper birds and mammals ( man ) in the middle sidesteps the crystal nature of our inner self. Radios use the amplification effect of crystals and the piezoelectric characterisitic of resonance to crystal structure ( geometry ). Saturn is the radio station for this solar system. The moon originated in Vela X-1 a constellation a long ways away from here. It is artificial. The EM spectrum contains the tiny sliver that is visible light : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_spectrum  so controlling magnetism is the real secret to power generation as we activate our light bodies. An 'L" is just a 90 degree phase shift.

Here is the reply I sent to Richard:

Hi Richard!
 
He has an interesting take on the subject, I will say that.
I disagree with some of his geometry and images but as i am
wont to do, I look for common ground and synchronicities.
 
His helical spirals are conical, while water votices are not,
they cascade through a 5 step geometrical process.
 
His 120 comment for atomic structure relates to stellated structures
as per this time synch I had on friday reading your reply.
I couldn't respond till today , minday, cuz the library is closed all weekend, sorry.

http://crystallizeyourlightbodynow.wordpress.com/2010/02/28/metatro...
 
He should reference www.MarkoRodin.com regarding his torus and Dr. Robert Moon
for the 3D reason for valence electron numbers:
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/
 
Regarding the cubic structure of the ether or cosmic lattice. One could argue it is tetrahedral
as this is logical ( without any imperial data ). Cubes are made of 5 tetrahedrons.
 
I still like the feminine Flower of Life and its 1, 6, 12, 18  ( which adds up to 37 a harmonic to the
fine structure constant )  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant
 
I like mixing Dan Winter's geometry with William Lyne's books on the EM Reaction
and ether flux ( no such thing as gravity to either one of these fellows! ).
 
But Dan is strongly supportive of Cotterell's credentials and track record.
 
Dan also gets magnet poles to phase conjugate even if they are both N or S.
Lots of inventors have made homopolar generators or N-machines ( Bruce Depalma is most famous ).
 
And lets not forget the work of Dayton Miller on 'ether drift'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dayton_Miller
http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm
 
I hope my reply was not akin to dumping a can of worms onto your plate of spaghetti Richard,
this is a difficult subject to say the least.
 
Take care,
Darren

• ▶ Reply